论文部分内容阅读
我国现行法律并不支持刑事诉讼中被害人及其近亲属主张精神损害赔偿。但是,笔者认为,刑事诉讼中适用精神损害赔偿有其必要性,主要理由如下:一、刑事附带民事诉讼在本质上、内容上仍然属于民事诉讼。我国侵权责任法第四条第(一)款规定“:侵权人因同一行为应当承担行政责任、刑事责任的,不影响依法承担侵权责任”。此处“侵权人”的概念应作广义的理解,它包括狭义的民事侵权法律关系中的侵权人,也包括刑事犯罪中的被告人。这种损害赔偿责任的确定,一是适用侵权责任法和其他相关法律的规定,二是在刑事诉讼或者行政诉讼中附带加以确定,因而才被称为附带的民事损害赔偿。刑事附带民事损害赔偿是由于法律规定竞合所致。当一种行
The current law in our country does not support the compensation of moral damages for the victims and their close relatives in criminal proceedings. However, the author believes that the application of moral damages in criminal proceedings is necessary, the main reasons are as follows: First, the criminal incidental civil proceedings in essence, the contents still belong to civil lawsuits. Article 4 (1) of the Tort Liability Law stipulates that: “The infringer shall bear the administrative responsibility and criminal responsibility for the same act, and shall not affect the liability of infringement according to law.” Here, the concept of “infringer” should be broadly understood. It includes infringers in the narrow legal relationship of tort and the defendants in criminal offenses. The determination of liability for such damages is based on the application of the Tort Liability Act and other relevant laws, and the second is defined incidentally in criminal proceedings or administrative proceedings and is therefore referred to as an incidental civil damages. Criminal incidental damages for civil damages are due to the co-operation of laws and regulations. When a line