“《责令限期改正通知书》中未注明清楚处罚依据和幅度范围;不是一案一卷,而是7月案件全部登记在一本案卷中,也没有区分行政许可卷、行政处罚卷等等;案卷无统一规范卷皮,案卷无目录,目录填写不规范,无顺序号,案卷无页码,未贴上封条并加盖骑缝章。”这是10月28日下午“依法行政天心行”活动年度总结讲评会上的一个片段。台上,长沙市天心区人民法院行政庭庭长唐美华,区人大代表李迎军,区人大内司工委主任贺喜等三位案件评议评查小组成员,分别对区卫生局、区公安分局、区城管执法大队等九家单位抽检的行政处罚类案件进行通报 “Notarize the deadline for correction notice” did not specify the basis for punishment and range; not a case of a volume, but in July all the cases registered in a file, there is no distinction between the administrative licensing volume, the volume of administrative penalties No case of uniform norms roll, the case no directory, directory filled non-standard, no sequence number, no page number of the case, not affixed to the seal and stamped riding seam chapter. “This is October 28 afternoon Line ”activity summary of the annual review of a fragment. On the stage, Tang Meihua, chief of the administrative court of Tianxin District People’s Court in Changsha City, Li Yingjun, district chief representative of the district people’s congress, and He Xi, director of the working committee of the district people’s congress of the district people’s congress, appraised the team members of the district health bureau, district public security bureau, Law enforcement brigade and other units sampled nine administrative penalties for notification