研究某一时期的文学史,仅仅着眼于那一时期的文学文本,肯定是很不够的。只着眼于文学文本,肯定不能对文本本身有深切、透彻、全面的认识。有各种各样的原因,可以影响一个时期的文学面貌;有各种各样的人物,可以左右一个时期的文学潮流。这些原因,可以本身是文学的,也可以本身完全是非文学的;这些人物,可以本身是文学界中人,也可以本身并非文坛人物。这些原因,这些人物,常被文学史家们所忽视,这是很不应该的。 最近,在《上海文学》上读到王晓明先生的《一份杂志和一个“社团”——重识“五·四”文学传统》一文。文中,王先生指出,如果没有 It is certainly not enough to study the literary history of a certain period just to focus on the literary texts of that period. Focusing solely on literary texts certainly can not have a deep, thorough and comprehensive understanding of the text itself. There are various reasons that can affect the literary appearance of a period; there are all sorts of people who can influence the literary trend of a period. These reasons may themselves be literary or entirely non-literary; these may themselves be literary figures or literary figures themselves. These reasons, these characters, often overlooked by literary historians, it is very undesirable. Recently, Mr. Wang Xiaoming’s “A Magazine and a” Society “were read in” Shanghai Literature, “a document entitled” Rereading the May Fourth "Literary Tradition. Text, Mr. Wang pointed out that if not