论文部分内容阅读
古朝鲜问题的研究涉及历史学、考古学以及民族学等,是东北亚学术界重要的研究课题,目前韩国学术界已经通过科研项目支撑取得了一系列重要成果,但是,结合中国考古学的最新发现与研究,这些成果还存在很多的局限性,我们有必要对其做全面系统的客观分析,并对部分观点提出质疑。其中,檀君朝鲜基本应限于文学领域研究,暂无太多的历史学及考古学证据;而鉴于中国东北地区青铜时代考古学文化的复杂性,也不宜简单对照推测“箕子朝鲜”的历史与文化;卫满朝鲜的资料虽然较多,但还有待于朝鲜学术界大量证据的支撑。
The study of the ancient Korean question involves history, archeology and ethnology. It is an important research topic in Northeast Asian academia. At present, the Korean academic community has made a series of important achievements supported by scientific research projects. However, based on the latest Chinese archeology However, there are still many limitations in these achievements. It is necessary for us to conduct a comprehensive and systematic objective analysis of the results and to challenge some of the views. However, given the complexity of the bronze age archaeological culture in northeast China, it is not appropriate to conclude that “North Korea of Jizi” History and culture of the country. Although the data of Wei Manchu and North Korea are more, they still have to be supported by a large amount of evidence from North Korea’s academic circles.