论文部分内容阅读
本文希望通过对美国在朝鲜战争中所做出的三个主要决策的案例分析--决定出兵进行大规模军事干涉、决定派大规模部队越过38线扩大战争、决定进行停战谈判,总结出朝鲜战争中美国决策的五个特点--逻辑起点为冷战中的美国全球战略利益、受战局变化直接影响、决策权力高度集中、决策层在决策时不优先考虑对策的合法性、受浓厚的意识形态倾向影响。
This article hopes that through the case analysis of the three main decisions made by the United States in the Korean War - decided to send troops for large-scale military intervention, decided to send large-scale troops to cross 38 lines to expand the war, decided to carry out armistice negotiations, summed up the Korean War The Five Starting Points for the United States and China in Decision-making - The logical starting point is the U.S. global strategic interest in the Cold War. Direct changes in the war on the ground affect the decision-making power. Decision-making authorities do not prioritize the legitimacy of their responses in decision-making. They are subject to strong ideological tendencies influences.