刑事案件的审查,归根结底是对证据的审查,证据是否完整,是否具有客观性、关联性、合法性直接关系到案件的认定。口供一直被视为证据之王,没有口供的案件在认定上一直存在着困难,司法责任制下,“零口供”案件更加难以认定。但广大司法工作者不应当畏首畏尾,应当提高担当、作为的能力,对符合证据完整性的案件坚决做认定犯罪的决定,有效的打击刑事犯罪与保护人权。 In the final analysis, the examination of criminal cases is the examination of evidence, whether the evidence is complete, whether it has objectivity, relevance, and legitimacy, and is directly related to the determination of a case. Confessions have always been regarded as the king of evidence, and there are always difficulties in the identification of confessions without the confession of confessions. Under the system of judicial responsibility, the case of “confession” is even more difficult to ascertain. However, the majority of judicial workers should not be afraid to hesitate and should increase their ability to assume and act as their own. They must resolutely make criminal decisions on cases that conform to the integrity of evidence and effectively combat criminal crimes and protect human rights.