中国对外贸易:本案的焦点在于广药集团与鸿道集团签订的商标许可补充协议是否有效,您有何看法?桂庆凯:虽然涉案各方没有完全披露许可协议的具体内容,但我们从本案纠纷的发生以及曲折而多变的争议解决过程,加之各有关方在媒体的公开言论,可以判断:对于基础许可协议,在内容上存在约定不充分的问题,基础许可协议是一切纠纷产生的根源。目前媒体用“断头许可”这个听上去有点 China Foreign Trade: What is the focus of this case on whether the Supplementary Agreement on Trademark Permits signed between GPHL and Hong Tao Group is valid? What is your opinion? Gui Qingkai: Although the parties involved did not fully disclose the details of the license agreement, The occurrence of disputes and the tortuous and controversial dispute resolution process, together with the public statements made by all parties concerned in the media, can determine that there is an inadequate agreement on the content of the basic license agreement. The basic license agreement is the root cause of all disputes . Currently the media used a “broken license” This sounds a bit