论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨改良导尿法在男性患者导尿中的应用价值。方法选取2014年9月至2015年8月辽宁省营口市老边区人民医院收治的96例泌尿系统结石患者作为研究对象,根据患者病历号尾数进行分组,尾数为奇数患者纳入研究组(46例),尾数为偶数患者为对照组(50例)。对照组患者应用传统导尿法,研究组患者采用改良导尿法进行干预,比较两组患者一次性插管成功率、疼痛情况及满意度。结果研究组患者一次性插管成功率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=9.137,P<0.05);研究组患者VAS评分为(2.4±0.4)分,明显低于对照组的(3.8±0.7)分,差异有统计学意义(t=11.314,P<0.05);研究组疼痛程度为0级和1级患者比例均明显高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);研究组患者的总满意度明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论改良导尿法在男性患者导尿中具有较高应用价值,可显著改善一次插管成功率,提高患者满意度,减轻疼痛。
Objective To explore the value of modified catheterization in the catheterization of male patients. Methods Ninety-six patients with urolithiasis admitted from the People’s Hospital of Laobian District, Yingkou City, Liaoning Province from September 2014 to August 2015 were enrolled in this study. Patients were enrolled in the study group (46 cases) , The even number of mantissa for the control group (50 cases). The control group of patients with traditional catheterization method, the study group patients with improved catheterization intervention, compared the success rate of one-time intubation, pain and satisfaction in both groups. Results The success rate of one-time intubation in study group was significantly higher than that in control group (χ ~ 2 = 9.137, P <0.05). The VAS score in study group was (2.4 ± 0.4) Group (3.8 ± 0.7), the difference was statistically significant (t = 11.314, P <0.05); the pain scores of the study group were 0 and 1, the proportion of patients were significantly higher than the control group, the differences were statistically significant ( All P <0.05). The total satisfaction of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Improved catheterization has a high value in the catheterization of male patients, which can significantly improve the success rate of primary intubation, improve patient satisfaction and relieve pain.