论文部分内容阅读
近20年来,中国研究者越来越多地使用“女性主义史学”这一西方舶来的术语,同时又对其加以解读。然而,学者们对女性主义史学的内涵、方法、兴起的时间等方面的认识都存在一定的差异。文章通过对女性主义史学与女性史学的比较,阐明了女性主义史学的研究主题、认识视角、分析方法,从而进一步明确女性主义史学并非对传统史学的彻底否定,它更多地是史学的一种新的研究视角、方法与立场。
In the recent 20 years, Chinese researchers have increasingly used the Western term “feminist historiography” and interpreted it at the same time. However, there are some differences between scholars about the connotation, method and time of the rise of feminist historiography. By comparing the feminist historiography and the feminine historiography, the article expounds the research theme, the cognition perspective and the analysis method of the feminist historiography so as to make it clear that feminist historiography is not a complete denial of traditional historiography. It is more of a historiography New research perspectives, methods and positions.