内指性是文学语言的基本特征之一,但文学与非文学并非二元对立,艺术真实需包含内指性和外指性两个层面。虽然内在的合理性通常作为文学批评实践的依据,但是内指与外指的矛盾统一为文学作品的读者接受提出了挑战。本文基于文学语言的内指与外指的矛盾统一关系来阐释对《我不是潘金莲》的争议性评论。本文认为从根本上需要的不是内指与外指的交融,而是读者与作者共谋,去努力接近作者的创作意图,挖掘作者的思想和创作构思。 Indiscrimination is one of the basic characteristics of literary language. However, literary and non-literary are not dualistic. Real art needs to include two aspects: internal fingering and external fingering. Although inherent rationality usually serves as a basis for literary criticism practice, the contradictory unity of the inner and outer fingers poses challenges for readers’ acceptance of literary works. Based on the contradictory and unity relations between the inner and outer fingers of the literary language, this article expounds the controversial comments on “I’m not Pan Jinlian”. This paper argues that what is fundamentally needed is not the blending of the inner and outer fingers, but the complicity of the reader and the author, efforts to approach the writer’s intention of creation, and to dig out the author’s ideas and creative ideas.