论文部分内容阅读
海外投资保险代位权的运行存在两方面的依据:一是国内海外投资保险法(或保险合同),二是国际双边投资保护协定。以何种方式和途径将两者链接以便国内法上的代位权获得国际法上的效力,从而确保代位权的实现是一个国家选择海外投资保险立法模式必须考虑的问题。我们只有在借鉴各国先进立法经验、适应海外投资实践要求的基础上,选择有别于美国和日本的折中立法模式,才能更有效地保护我国的海外投资和投资者。
There are two aspects to the operation of overseas investment insurance subrogation: the first is the domestic overseas investment insurance law (or insurance contract), and the second is the international bilateral investment protection agreement. How to link the two in order to gain the international law validity of the subrogation right in the domestic law so as to ensure that the realization of the subrogation right is a question which must be considered when a country chooses the overseas investment insurance legislation mode. Only by referring to the advanced legislative experiences of various countries and adapting to the requirements of overseas investment practice, we can choose the eclectic legislative model that is different from the United States and Japan in order to protect our overseas investment and investors more effectively.