论文部分内容阅读
在朝鲜半岛的独立运动史上,申采浩、李会荣具有重要的历史地位。但在对二人的研究评价过程中,不论是韩国的研究者还是中国的研究者,对他们在中国境内所从事的民族独立运动、政治主张都没有给予客观公正及全面而又负责任的肯定,只是笼统地为二人盖棺定论,称之为在中国境内的韩国无政府主义运动活动家。究其根源就在于我们没有从历史的发展变化中看待二人的政治主张。笔者从历史的宏观与微观上对申采浩、李会荣的政治主张与无政府主义所倡导的学说加以比较,从而认定其二人绝非无政府主义者,而是韩国民族独立运动杰出的领导者,韩国民族民主主义社会活动家。
In the history of the independence movement in the Korean Peninsula, Shen Caihao and Li Huirong have an important historical status. However, in the process of evaluating and evaluating the two people, both Korean researchers and Chinese researchers did not affirm their objective, fair, comprehensive and responsible affirmations of the national independence movements and political opinions that they are engaged in in China. , But concludes with a general conclusion of the two, calling it an anarchist South Korean activist in China. The reason is that we did not view the two political ideas from the historical development and changes. The author compares the political propositions advocated by Shen Caihao and Li Huirong with those advocated by anarchism from a historical macro and micro perspective and concludes that the two are by no means anarchists but an outstanding leader of the Korean National Independence Movement. National democratic activist.