由于描述性商标除“第二含义”外还具有属于社会公共领域内的固有含义,本身的显著特征较弱。即使依靠“第二含义”获得商标注册,为了保护公众利益,其权利保护范围也会受到一定的限制。本文结合国内的司法实践,梳理和论述了描述性商标的注册限制及描述性商标的合理使用制度。 As the descriptive trademark in addition to “second meaning ” also has the inherent meaning belonging to the public sphere of the public, its own salient features are weaker. Even if relying on the “second meaning” for trademark registration, in order to protect the public interests, the scope of its rights protection will be subject to certain restrictions. Combining with the domestic judicial practice, this article combs and discusses the restriction of the registration of descriptive marks and the reasonable use of descriptive marks.