论文部分内容阅读
关于抵押权,如将其与质权进行比较,由于抵押权的设定者在保留对抵押标的物的占有的同时,依然能以该抵押标的物对债权进行担保,所以可以将其理解为是对标的物的“价值(流通价值)权”的支配,当债权无法得到清偿时,通过发动处分权实现“价值(返还)”的制度。与其相对,所谓质权,就是将标的物的占有移转至债权人,使其能够支配该标的物的“用益价值”。以这些基本原理为前提,本文将对日本的抵押权的实行方式与优先受偿权的方法进行考察。
On the mortgage, if compared with the pledge, because the mortgagee’s right to retain the possession of the object of the mortgage while still being able to guarantee the subject matter of the secured creditor’s right, it can be understood as The subject matter of the “value (value of the (value of the currency),” the domination, when claims can not be settled, through the implementation of the right to dispose of “value (return)” system. In contrast, the so-called pledge is to transfer the possession of the subject matter to the creditor so that it can control the “value of use” of the subject matter. To these basic principles as a precondition, this article will examine the method of implementation of the mortgage in Japan and the priority of compensation.