论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较热敏灸与舒利迭治疗慢性哮喘临床效果。方法:将我院收治的慢性哮喘患者分为对照组和观察组。对照组给予舒利迭进行治疗,观察组则给予热敏灸治疗,比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果:观察组治疗有效率88.10%高于对照组的66.67%,FEV1值2.94±0.24L、PEF值6.46±0.67L/s高于对照组的2.61±0.25L、5.58±0.51L/s,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:热敏灸与舒利迭治疗慢性哮喘均具有一定的疗效,但是热敏灸改善患者临床症状、肺部功能等方面效果更优于舒利迭,值得推广。
Objective: To compare the clinical effects of thermal moxibustion and seretide for chronic asthma. Methods: Patients with chronic asthma admitted to our hospital were divided into control group and observation group. The control group was given seretide treatment, the observation group was given thermal moxibustion treatment, the treatment effect of two groups were compared. Results: The effective rate of observation group was 88.10% higher than 66.67% of control group, FEV1 was 2.94 ± 0.24L, PEF was 6.46 ± 0.67L / s, which was higher than that of control group (2.61 ± 0.25L, 5.58 ± 0.51L / s) There was statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion: Both heat-sensitive moxibustion and seretide have some curative effects on chronic asthma. However, thermal moxibustion is better than seretide in improving clinical symptoms and lung function of patients, which is worth promoting.