论文部分内容阅读
死刑裁判目前的宣判模式具有对社会宣判的迟延性,对罪犯宣判的相对公开性,对辩护人、代理人宣布的滞后性,死刑裁判宣布与执行的一致性的特点。死刑裁判现行宣判模式具有思想基础,以及人们时裁判宣判模式的价值存在认识偏差的基础,它具有经济价值与社会价值。但是,过分强调社会公共利益而忽视了个人利益,悖于刑事诉讼法所规定的公开审判制度、死刑执行犹豫制度, 阻断了司法中的法文化交流,使司法活动失去了监督。进而提出明确规定死刑裁判宣判的方式,明确规定死刑裁判宣判与执行的时间间隔,明确规定罪犯亲属及辩护人、人民检察院异议的审查程序。
The current sentencing model of death penalty referees possesses the characteristics of delay to sentencing of society, relative openness to sentencing of guilty parties, lagging declaration of defenders and agents, and consistency between proclamation and implementation of death sentence. The current sentencing model of the death penalty referee has the ideological basis and the basis for understanding the value of the sentencing judgment model of people, which has economic value and social value. However, over-emphasizing social public interests and neglecting individual interests are contrary to the open trial system stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Law and the hesitation system for the execution of death penalty, thus blocking the legal culture communication in judicial administration and losing the supervision of judicial activities. Furthermore, it puts forward a clear way to stipulate the sentencing of the death penalty referee, clearly stipulates the time interval between the sentencing and execution of the death penalty referee, and clearly stipulates the examination procedure of objection to the relatives and defenders of the criminals and the People’s Procuratorate.