关于图书与情报一体化(以下称“一体化”)的讨论,已历时数载,成果不小,使人受益匪浅。为了把讨论进一步引向深入,笔者试图通过此文提出整体系统的概念,并剖析其结构,借以论证图书与情报的关系问题,在此基础上,亦顺便就图书情报工作的改革方向问题,表表个人的拙见。整体系统的平面流程论证“整体系统”这个概念的主要目的之一,就是想澄清一下人们对“一体化”的各种理解。由于在讨论中,有的同志对“一体化”的表述曾提出过一些异议,这固然是可以讨论的,但终非实质问题。笔者认为,无论其表述是否妥贴,而其机构本来就应该是一个整体系统。所以“一体化”和“整体系统”实质上是一码事。把“一体化”改作“整体化”或“整体系统”也许要更好些。笔者曾在前两篇“一体化”讨论文章中这样讲过:“按照系统工程的观点,一个系统有其整体功能或运动目标,全系统的整体功能和目 The discussions on the integration of books and information (hereinafter referred to as “integration”) have taken many years and the results have been very fruitful. In order to further deepen the discussion, the author attempts to propose the concept of holistic system through this article and analyze its structure in order to demonstrate the relationship between books and intelligence. On the basis of this, we also discuss the reform direction of library and information work. My humble opinion of the table. One of the main purposes of the “whole system” concept of the overall system's flat process is to clarify the various understandings of “integration.” Since some comrades raised some objections to the expression of “integration” during the discussion, it is certainly possible to discuss it, but it is ultimately not a question of substance. In my opinion, no matter whether its formulation is proper or not, its institution should have been an overall system. So “integration” and “overall system” are essentially one thing. It may be better to change “integration” to “integration” or “overall system.” The author once said in the first two articles on “integration”: "According to the viewpoint of system engineering, a system has its overall function or moving target, the whole system's overall function and purpose