论文部分内容阅读
一般认为,对整体化截然不同的态度是萨特和后结构主义思想家的重大差别。这种认识忽视了萨特晚期思想的发展。在《辩证理性批判》中,萨特悬置了难以解决的总体整体化的问题,认为现实中的整体化是个体的整体化和发展中的整体化,把关注点落实到复杂的共时层面,这使他的思考衔接上了后结构主义的理论脉络,既是萨特本人辩证法和整体化思想的重要发展,也是萨特对整体化哲学的重要贡献。
It is generally assumed that the very different attitude toward holism is a significant difference between Sartre and post-structuralism thinkers. This understanding ignores the development of Sartre’s late thought. In “Critique of Dialectical Reason”, Sartre suspended the difficult issue of overall integration. He concluded that the integration in reality is the integration of individuals and the development of globalization, and the focus is on the complex synchronic level , Which made his thinking connect with the post-structuralist theoretical context. It is not only an important development of Sartre’s own dialectics and holistic thinking, but also an important contribution of Sartre to holistic philosophy.