论文部分内容阅读
世界第七、江苏第一高楼—紫峰大厦旁,出现一栋号称是“紫峰绿洲国际会所”的小楼,装修样式与紫峰大厦十分相像。对这种不打招呼“傍大楼”的做法,紫峰大厦的主人很不爽,在与对方交涉无果后,一纸诉状将其告上法庭。由于此案在法律上的特殊性,南京市中级人民法院适用反不正当竞争法的一般条款于今年5月判决“山寨版”小楼的主人赔偿8万元,并在企业字号及店招中禁用“紫峰”字样。法庭认为,不正当竞争行为侵害的是一种商业上的利益,而不限于权利,必须通过公认的商业道德标准来判断当事人是否构成不正当竞争,这一观点也成为此案判决的一大亮点。
The world’s seventh, Jiangsu’s tallest building - next to the Zifeng Building, there is a known as “Zifeng Oasis International Club ” small building, decoration style and Zifeng Building is very similar. This does not say hello “Pong Building ” approach, the owner of the Zifeng Building is very unhappy, after no deal with each other fruitless, a paper complaint to the court. Due to the special nature of the case in the law, Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court applied the general provisions of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law in May this year, the verdict, “cottage” small building owner compensation 80,000 yuan, and in the corporate name and store Recruitment disabled “Zifeng ” words. The court held that the unfair competition practices infringe on a commercial interest, not limited to rights, must be recognized by the business ethics standards to determine whether the parties constitute unfair competition, this view has also become a highlight of the case decision .