论文部分内容阅读
本文以中国农作物秸秆资源化利用补偿政策为例,采用条件价值评估方法分别在两种补偿方式(以农户为补偿单位和以耕地面积为补偿单位)下评估了农户的受偿意愿。结果显示,两种补偿方式下估算的农户受偿意愿存在显著差异。农户资源化处理农作物秸秆的边际成本递减、环境价值对农户的边际效用递减以及农户对补偿方式变化的不敏感性,是造成这一差异的主要原因。对补偿政策熟悉程度或认知水平更高的农户在两种补偿方式下的受偿意愿具有更强的一致性。在此基础上,本文建议政府在实施秸秆资源化利用补偿政策之前,应该着力于提高农户对补偿政策的认知,并重视秸秆产量更高的农户。
This paper takes the compensation policy of China’s crop straw resources utilization as an example to evaluate the compensation willingness of rural households under the condition of two kinds of compensation methods (using compensation units of farmers and compensation units of cultivated land) as condition value assessment methods. The results show that there are significant differences in the willingness of farmers to be estimated under the two compensation methods. The marginal cost of farmers ’resource management of crop straw decreases, and the marginal utility of environmental value to farmers decreases and the peasants’ insensitivity to the change of compensation methods are the main reasons for this difference. Farmers who are familiar with the compensation policy or have a higher level of cognition have a stronger consistency in their willingness to pay for the two kinds of compensation. On this basis, the paper suggests that before implementing the compensation policy of straw resource utilization, the government should focus on improving farmers’ understanding of compensation policies and emphasizing farmers with higher straw output.