论文部分内容阅读
事实发现理论以对案件事实真相的追求为目的而无视或轻视程序的作用,最终导致程序的失灵。作为事实发现理论的替代性理论,法律事实建构论在强调主体对于法律事实的主观建构的同时,特别凸显了程序在事实形成过程中的价值与意义。法律事实建构论下程序的功能主要表现在,为法律事实建构活动提供了一个空间。法律事实的建构主要是通过开场陈述、举证与质证、法庭辩论等程序展开的。
The theory of fact discovery disregards or despises the function of the procedure with the purpose of pursuing the truth of the case, which eventually leads to the failure of the procedure. As an alternative theory of fact finding theory, legal fact construct theory emphasizes the subjective construction of legal facts by the subject and at the same time highlights the value and significance of the procedure in fact formation. The function of the procedural under the law of fact construction is mainly manifested in that it provides a space for the construction of legal facts. The construction of legal facts is mainly through the opening statements, evidence and testimony, court proceedings and other procedures.