论文部分内容阅读
史学界有一种非常有影响的观点,认为当代人写当代史不能保证史学的客观性和真实性。从中国史学发展史的角度看,这是不符合事实的。当代人写当代史是中国传统史学的优良传统。晚清民初,思想界对于民史、君史、国史、党史关系的讨论,彰显了当代人写当代史在理论领域的与时俱进,而20世纪80年代以来,有关中华人民共和国史编撰实践的得失也表明当代人写当代史不仅是可能的,而且是必要的,其中最大的启示是设立国史馆。
Historiography has a very influential point of view, that modern contemporary history can not guarantee the objectivity and authenticity of history. From the perspective of the history of Chinese history, this is not true. Contemporary history is the fine tradition of Chinese traditional history. In the late Qing Dynasty and early Republican period, the discussion of the relations between the history of the people, the history of the monarchy, the history of the country, and the history of the party history by the world of thought demonstrated that contemporary people write contemporary history in the field of theory with the times, and since the 1980s, the history of the People’s Republic of China The pros and cons of compiling practice also shows that it is not only possible but necessary for the present generation to write contemporary history. The greatest enlightenment is the establishment of the History Museum.