在民事诉讼中 ,“其他人”帮助当事人伪造证据的 ,可以定性为帮助伪造证据罪 ,而当事人自己伪造证据的 ,却缺乏相应的“当事人伪造证据罪”予以处罚 ,其能否定罪、如何定罪 ,争议也极大。为避免放纵犯罪 ,本文通过评析有关个罪的特征 ,重点从当事人伪造证据的目的和行为两方面来考察其定罪的可行性与合理性。 In civil lawsuit, “other people” help the parties to forge evidence, which can be defined as helping to forge evidence of crime, while the parties themselves forged evidence, but lack the corresponding “party forging evidence” to be punished, it can convict, how to condemn The controversy is also great. In order to avoid indulging crime, this article examines the feasibility and rationality of the conviction by analyzing the characteristics of the crimes and focusing on the purpose and behavior of the parties forging evidence.