论文部分内容阅读
目的比较保元汤汤剂与免煎剂辅治慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效。方法选取慢性心力衰竭患者90例,随机分为观察组与对照组各45例,2组均予常规治疗,观察组在此基础上加用保元汤汤剂,对照组加用保元汤免煎剂。观察、比较2组临床疗效与不良反应发生情况。结果观察组总有效率为84.44%,优于对照组的66.67%(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率为13.33%,对照组为11.11%(P>0.05)。结论保元汤汤剂辅治慢性心力衰竭疗效优于保元汤免煎剂,安全可靠,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of Bao Yuan Tang Decoction and decoction in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Methods 90 cases of chronic heart failure patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group of 45 cases, two groups were given routine treatment, the observation group based on the use of Bao Yuan Tang decoction, the control group plus Bao Yuan Tang Decoction. Observed, compared two groups of clinical efficacy and adverse reactions occurred. Results The total effective rate in observation group was 84.44%, which was higher than that in control group (66.67%, P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 13.33% and in the control group was 11.11% (P> 0.05). Conclusion Baoyuan Decoction is better than Baoyuan Decoction in treating chronic heart failure, which is safe and reliable and worthy of clinical application.