论文部分内容阅读
目的比较传统开腹与腹腔镜切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效。方法整理我院2008年1月-2012年4月收治的急性阑尾炎患者病例,随机抽取76例,并根据手术方法随机分为对照组(行开腹手术)40例、实验组(行腹腔镜手术)36例。在疗效、平均手术时间、术后并发症、术后排气时间及住院时间方面对两组进行比较。结果有明显差异(P<0.05)的方面有疗效、平均手术时间、术后并发症、术后排气及住院时间,在平均手术时间方面无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜切除术在创伤、术后并发症发病率及住院时间上效果优于开腹手术。
Objective To compare the efficacy of traditional laparotomy and laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Methods A total of 76 patients with acute appendicitis admitted from January 2008 to April 2012 in our hospital were randomly divided into control group (40 cases undergoing laparotomy) and experimental group (laparoscopic surgery ) 36 cases. The two groups were compared in terms of efficacy, mean operative time, postoperative complications, postoperative exhaust time, and hospital stay. The results were significantly different (P <0.05) aspects of the effect, the average operation time, postoperative complications, postoperative exhaust and hospital stay, there was no significant difference in mean operative time (P> 0.05). Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery is superior to open surgery in the incidence of trauma, postoperative morbidity and hospital stay.