论文部分内容阅读
2016年7月12日,南海仲裁案仲裁庭不顾中国政府的严正抗议,坚持判决菲律宾胜诉,否认了中国对南海海域的历史所有权。一时之间,这一消息立即引爆了各大媒体,在各大社交媒体上弥漫着对于仲裁庭的批评,无数网民自发号召民众抵制菲律宾商品,甚至抵制日货,抵制美货,并将其与爱国与否挂钩,似乎在这一特殊的历史背景之下,国人如果再选择购买菲律宾、美国或者日本的商品,就等于支持这些在国际政治经济舞台中敌视我国、损害我国利益的国家的反华行为,是一种实质上的卖国行为。
On July 12, 2016, the arbitration tribunal in the South China Sea arbitrated the Chinese government’s solemn protest and insisted that the Philippines prevail and denied China’s historical ownership of the South China Sea. For a time, this news immediately detonated the major media, filled with criticisms of arbitration tribunals on major social media. Countless netizens spontaneously called on the public to boycott the Philippine goods and even boycotted the Japanese goods to boycott them, Patriotic or not, it seems that under this particular historical background, if people choose to buy the Philippines, the United States or Japan’s commodities again, they would be tantamount to supporting these anti-China actions in those countries hostile to China and damaging the interests of our country in the international political and economic arena , Is a real sellers behavior.