论文部分内容阅读
应如何处理民法典与司法解释的关系,是民法典编纂绕不过去的疑题。我国的民商事司法解释主要包括综合类、创设类和细化类三类,针对这三类司法解释,应尽快组建专职的司法解释清理(整顿)委员会,由其负责从中剥离出若干有价值的规范,纳入民法典。在吸收方法上,创设类司法解释可采用规则吸收方法,综合类和细化类司法解释因未创设新规则可采用观念吸收方法。待民法典颁布后,应逐步限制最高院的司法解释权,同时适时扩张指导性案例制度的适用范围,藉此彻底理顺立法和司法解释的关系。
How to deal with the relationship between civil code and judicial interpretation is the doubt of compilation of civil code. Judicial interpretation of civil and commercial matters in our country mainly consists of three categories: general category, creation category and detailed category. For these three types of judicial interpretation, a full-time judicial interpretation and cleanup (rectification) committee should be set up as soon as possible to remove some valuable Standardization, into the civil code. In the absorption method, the creation of class judicial interpretation can adopt the rule absorption method, the comprehensive class and detailed class judicial interpretation can not adopt the concept of absorption method because the new rule is not created. After the promulgation of the Civil Code, the judicial interpretation power of the Supreme People’s Court should be gradually restricted, and at the same time, the scope of application of the guiding case system should be expanded in time to thoroughly clarify the relationship between legislation and judicial interpretation.