论文部分内容阅读
通过分析目前对科技期刊学术水平评价中存在的主要问题,提出科技期刊学术质量的评价应根据已经建立的期刊定量评价综合指标体系的各指标(如影响因子、被引频次、平均引文率、基金资助论文比例、他被引率等),按不同学科科技期刊制定不同指标的权重进行定量分析的结果作为参考,由同行专家进行评价的方法是最为科学和合理的。
By analyzing the main problems existing in the evaluation of the academic level of sci-tech periodicals, it is suggested that the evaluation of the academic quality of sci-tech periodicals should be based on the quantitative evaluation of each index of the comprehensive index system (such as impact factor, citation frequency, average citation rate, fund The proportion of papers funded, the rate of his being cited, etc.). According to the quantitative analysis results of different disciplines of sci-tech periodicals with different indicators as a reference, the method evaluated by experts in the same field is the most scientific and reasonable.