论文部分内容阅读
证明标准是证据法中的核心和灵魂,对于民事诉讼中的证明标准问题无论是理论界还是实务界一直存在激烈的争论。《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第73条第一次以司法解释的形式将高度盖然性作为某些民事诉讼的证明标准。事实上,在所有的民事案件中都适用该标准是不合理的。我国的民事诉讼证明标准可以从以下方面进一步完善:(一)从立法上对民事诉讼的证明标准作出原则性的规定;(二)制定统一的《证据法》规范我国的民事诉讼证明标准;(三)我国的民事诉讼证明标准应当实现多元化。
The standard of proof is the core and soul of the law of evidence. There has been heated argument over the standard of proof in civil lawsuits both in theory and in practice. Article 73 of the Supreme People’s Court’s Several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Litigation, for the first time, uses a high degree of probability in the form of judicial interpretation as the proof of certain civil actions. In fact, it is unreasonable to apply this standard in all civil cases. China’s civil litigation certification standards can be further improved from the following aspects: (1) from the legislative proof of the standard of civil litigation to make the principle of provisions; (B) to develop a unified “Evidence Act” to standardize the proof of civil litigation in China; ( C) China’s civil litigation certification standards should be diversified.