法国作家莫泊桑的短篇小说《项链》,以其看似平常 却又独特的故事,深受广大读者喜爱。许多年来,对女 主人公玛蒂尔德的看法,几乎是一致的——她是一个被 资产阶级虚荣心腐蚀而导致丧失青春年华的悲剧形象。 教学参考书上是这样写的,学术文章是这样分析的,许 多语文老师也都这样讲。近年来关于这篇小说的评论 文章发表的不少,但充其量是在以上形象定位的范畴内 作些微调,本质上并没有多大区别。果真如此吗?难道我 们从莫泊桑的小说中就没有读出别的体验和看法吗? French writer Maupassant’s short story “necklace”, with its seemingly ordinary but unique story, loved by the majority of readers. For many years her view of heroine Mathilde has been almost unanimous - she is a tragic figure that has been eroded by the bourgeois vanity in its youth. Teaching reference book is written like this, academic articles are analyzed in this way, many language teachers also say so. In recent years, many commentary articles on this novel have been published, but at best, some fine-tuning has been made in the context of the above image orientation. In essence, there is not much difference between them. Is this really true? Do not we read any other experiences or opinions from Maupassant’s novels?