论文部分内容阅读
从主题上探讨包容性生态民主理论在1997-2007年间的新进展可以分为三个部分:第一部分探讨与包容性民主相关的理论问题;第二部分论述由包容性民主计划所阐发的全球化理论,以及它与左翼的非系统的全球化阐释方法的不同;第三部分在说明旧的反体系运动和新社会运动为什么日趋衰退或被吸纳进既存体系的同时,阐明包容性民主计划如何区别于其他激进的政治方案。包容性民主计划所设想的新型反体系运动,无论在总体目标还是具体手段上都与传统的反体系运动有着根本性的差别,而它转型战略的基本原则是:既然系统性的变革目标要求实现在制度和文化层面上与过去的断裂,就必须创建新的政治组织和致力于体系变革的新的全面的政治纲领,并同时在大规模民众层面上造就清晰的反体系意识。
From the theme to discuss the new progress of inclusive ecological democracy theory in 1997-2007 can be divided into three parts: the first part discusses the theoretical issues related to inclusive democracy; the second part discusses the globalization of inclusive democracy plan Theory and its difference from the left-wing non-systematic methods of global interpretation. The third part explains why the old anti-system and neo-social movements are declining or being absorbed into the existing system. In other radical political programs. The new type of anti-system movement envisioned by the Inclusive Democracy Program has a fundamental difference from the traditional anti-system movement, both in its overall goal and its specific approach. The basic principle of its transformation strategy is that since the goal of systematic change is required At the institutional and cultural level, the break with the past requires the creation of new political organizations and a new, comprehensive political program that is committed to the transformation of the system, while at the same time creating a clear sense of anti-systemism at a large-scale public level.