论文部分内容阅读
存在原本就存在解释,事实的认定离不开事实的解释。解释事实的前提是理解事实,理解事实需要具备理解的要件——前见。事实应作为解释的客体对象的同时又限定了解释的视角。规则留出的种种空白必然经法官予以填补,法官也借助于这些空间张显出对事实的个性化评判。解释不是一种事实的原本复制,而是一种创造性行为,一种个性化的建构事实“血肉”的行为。实现忠实于事实的要求有两个困难:一是究竟有没有“原事实”会形成不同的解释;二是对“原事实”的识别不能离开现实的因素。事实解释应受约束于各种可能性因素,这些因素综合起来确保了解释符合事实的理性方向。
Existence exists to explain the existence of facts can not be separated from the fact that the explanation. The premise to explain the facts is to understand the facts, understand the facts need to have the elements of understanding - pre-see. Fact should be the object of interpretation at the same time as defining the perspective of interpretation. The various gaps left by the rules must be filled by judges. Judges also use these spaces to make their own personal judgment on the facts. Interpretation is not a reproduction of the original fact, but a creative act, a personalized act of “flesh and blood” construction of facts. There are two difficulties in fulfilling the requirements of being faithful to facts: First, are there any different interpretations of the “original facts”? Second, the recognition of “original facts ” can not be separated from the reality. Factual interpretations should be governed by a variety of possible factors that, taken together, ensure that rational explanations of fact are factual.