克罗齐在精神哲学的理论坐标中对美学独立性的论证,为破解“实践美学派”与“后实践美学派”之间的争论提供了可能的借鉴。应首先区分作为整体的“实践活动”与对“实践活动”的掌握方式,然后厘定审美活动、科学活动、经济活动与伦理活动之间的边界,进而才可能将实践的观点真正贯彻到美学研究中去。 Croce ’s argument on the independence of aesthetics in the theoretical coordinates of spiritual philosophy provides a possible reference for solving the debate between “practical aesthetics” and “practice aesthetics” after “. We should first distinguish between ”practice activities“ as a whole and mastery of ”practice activities" and then determine the boundary between aesthetic activities, scientific activities, economic activities and ethical activities, so as to make it possible to truly practice the viewpoint To carry out the study of aesthetics.