论文部分内容阅读
目的 对比分析China-LISS接骨板和LISS接骨板治疗股骨远端骨折的疗效、不良反应及膝关节功能.方法 选取本院2014年8月至2016年10月收治的106例股骨远端骨折患者,随机分为对照组(53例)和治疗组(53例),治疗组患者应用China-LISS接骨板治疗,对照组患者应用LISS接骨板治疗.比较两组的疗效、不良反应及膝关节功能.结果 治疗组和对照组的总优良率、治疗1年后的各项Evanich膝关节评分相比差异均无显著性(P>0.05).治疗组的手术时间、切口长度[分别为(100.4±20.9)min、(11.0±2.3)cm]均显著低于对照组[分别为(115.2±38.5)min、(14.4±5.0)cm],差异有显著性(P0.05],另外,治疗组患者的下床活动时间、骨折愈合时间、住院时间、治疗费用[分别为(51.1±12.6)天、(10.7±2.2)周、(21.7±7.4)天、(1.22±0.09)万元]显著低于对照组[分别为(66.9±17.1)天、(12.1±3.3)周、(29.6±8.4)天、(2.61±0.06)万元],差异有显著性(P<0.05),术后不良反应发生率也显著低于对照组(13.16％vs 36.84％,P0.05); The operative time and incision length were (100.4±20.9)min, (11.0±2.3)cm, were significantly lower than the control group (115.2±38.5)min, (14.4±5.0)cm, the difference was significant (P<0.05). In the treatment group, the time of getting out of bed, the time of fracture healing, the length of hospitalization and the cost of treatment were (51.1±12.6)d, (10.7±2.2)w, (21.7±7.4)d, (12.2±0.9) thousand Yuan, and (66.1±17.1)d, (12.1±3.3)w, (29.6±8.4)d, (26.1±0.6) thousand Yuan, the difference was significant (P<0.05); the incidence of adverse reactions was lower in treatment group than in control group, the difference was statistically significant (13.16％ vs 36.84％, P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of China-LISS plate in the treatment of distal femoral fractures is significant, and the adverse reactions are few, which can effectively restore the function of knee joint and have clinical value.