论文部分内容阅读
中国在西周至春秋战国时期，在农业耕作上普遍采用“畎亩法”。三国韦昭在为《国语》作注；西晋司马彪在为《庄子》作疏时，都把“畎亩”解作“垄作法”。到了现代农史界和史学界的许多研究者，却把畎亩法”解作“畦种法”。究竟“畎亩法”，是“垄作法”？还是“畦种法”？这是一个关系到对当时的耕作水平和生产力水平作出正确估价的问题，因此，有必要把它探讨明白。我们在本文中根据《吕氏春秋》任地和辩土两篇农业论文中有关“畎亩法”的多方面的阐述；西周至春秋战国时代的生产力水平，特别是耕作工具和农耕动力等条件；以及农业技术的传承关系等，认为“畎亩法”确系“垄作法”，而非“畦种法”。
During the period from the Western Zhou Dynasty to the Spring and Autumn and the Warring States period, China commonly adopted the “畎 Mu Law” in agricultural farming. Wei Zhao of the Three Kingdoms is a note for “Mandarin.” When Sima Biao of the Western Jin Dynasty made a study of “Chuang Tzu”, he interpreted “Ao Mu” as “the law of the ridge.” To many researchers in the modern history of agriculture and history, however, they have interpreted the law of mu as a “law of cultivation.” Is it “law of the land” or “law of cultivation”? This is a It is necessary to put it into consideration.We are in this paper based on the “Lu’s Spring and Autumn Annals,” and two agricultural papers on the “ ”; From the Western Zhou Dynasty to the Spring and Autumn and the Warring States Period productivity level, especially the conditions of farming tools and farming motivation; and the inheritance relations of agricultural technology, etc., that the“ 畎 Mu Law ”is indeed“ ridge law ”rather than“畦 species Act. ”