论文部分内容阅读
与传统媒体相比,新媒体更容易对风险进行前所未有的社会放大。本文主要以雷洋事件为例从责难信号的角度谈风险的社会放大。责难信号可以从四个角度来阐述:信号源、信号量、信号流以及责难的多重向度。在分析了信号源、信号量和信号流之后,将讨论雷洋事件中对受害者责难的性质。然后,信号依据责难的多重向度被组织分类,这些向度包括:信号中的焦点、与被责难者的熟悉程度、被责难者与人们在空间上的接近程度,以及责难分配方面的全面性。从每个角度都有详细的探讨,随后做出了关于雷洋事件中责难如何可以助长风险的社会放大的结论。
Compared with traditional media, new media are more likely to amplify the unprecedented social risk. In this paper, Lei Yang incident as an example from the angle of censure signal on the risk of social amplification. Censorship signals can be stated in four perspectives: signal source, semaphore, signal flow, and multiple degrees of censure. After analyzing the signal sources, semaphores and signal flows, the nature of the censure of victims in the Thunderbird incident will be discussed. The signals are then organized according to the multidimensional nature of the censure, including the focus in the signal, familiarity with the censured person, the spatial proximity of the censured person and people, and the comprehensiveness of censure distribution . From each perspective, there is a detailed discussion, followed by a conclusion about the social amplification of how censure can contribute to risk in the Thunderville incident.