丰南信用社与经营部系借贷关系,经营部与供应站则是购销关系。显然这是两种不同的法律关系。现在,供应站与经营部发生经济纠纷,丰南信用社与本案无利害关系,却成为共同被告。从一、二审所认定的事实与适用法律来看,是值得商榷和探究的。一、明知经营部严重亏损,丰南信用社仍继续放贷。明知严重亏损,不能继续放贷,这不知是《经济合同法》还是有关金融法规那一条所规定的 Fengnan Credit Cooperatives and the Department of business loans, business department and supply station is the relationship between buying and selling. Obviously this is two different legal relations. Now, there is an economic dispute between the supply station and the operation department. Fengnan Credit Cooperative has no interest in the case but has become a co-defendant. Judging from the facts and applicable laws found in the first instance and the second instance, it is worth discussing and exploring. First, knowing that the business department suffered a serious loss, Fengnan Credit Cooperatives continued to lend. Knowing that a serious loss, can not continue lending, I do not know this is the “Economic Contract Law” or the relevant provisions of the financial regulations that