论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院就道路交通事故中无名尸的损害赔偿和保险赔偿作出了规定,可以为无名尸案件的裁判乱象画上统一“休止符”。而伤残无名氏的损害赔偿和保险赔偿,从法律、法规到司法解释均未作出规定,实践中存在争议,但鲜见理论探讨。道路交通事故中伤残无名氏受害人的损害赔偿和保险赔偿问题,争议集中在民政部门代理起诉肇事者和保险公司是否具有代理资格。从现有立法看,民政部门代理属于精神病人的伤残无名氏受害人诉求赔偿,是具备法律依据的;但民政部门代理非精神病人的伤残无名氏受害人诉求赔偿,尚缺乏明确的法律规定。为解决这一问题,建议国家在立法层面上简单地修改有关条文。
The Supreme People’s Court made provision for the damages and insurance indemnities of the unnamed corpse in a road traffic accident and could draw a uniform “rest symbol” for the referee chaos of the unnamed corpse case. However, there is no stipulation in the compensation for injury and indemnity for the disabled anonymous from the laws and regulations to the judicial interpretation. There is controversy in practice but rare theoretical discussion. Dispute compensation and insurance compensation for disabled anonymous victims in road traffic accidents are mainly concerned with the fact that the civil affairs department acts as the agent of prosecutors and insurance companies. Judging from the existing legislation, the civil affairs department acts as a proxy for the disabled and anonymous victims who are mentally ill to claim for compensation, which is a legal basis. However, there is a lack of clear legal provisions for the civil affairs department to represent the disabled and anonymous victims of non-mental patients for compensation. To solve this problem, it is suggested that the state simply amend the relevant provisions at the legislative level.