2010年5月9日,被判死缓、已服刑整整11年的赵作海被宣告无罪释放以来,关于该事件的报道成为媒体报道的焦点。那么,作为党和政府喉舌的党报以及作为“党报的一种补充”的都市类报纸,在赵作海案件的报道上是否一致?孰优孰劣?一、比较结果及分析1.报道数量分析。对于赵作海案件的报道,从5月9日到6月8日,《四川日报》(下简称《日报》)报道5篇、《华西都市报》(下简称《华西》)报道11篇。另外,《华西》在5月10日就率先报道“赵作海被无罪释放”;《日报》第一篇有关此事件的 On May 9, 2010, Zhao Zuohai, who was sentenced to death and sentenced to 11 years in prison, was acquitted. Since then, coverage of the incident has become the focus of media coverage. Then, as a party and government mouthpiece of the party newspaper and as a “supplement of the party newspaper” urban newspapers in the case of Zhao Zuohai reports are the same? Which one is better? First, the comparison and analysis 1. Analysis of the number of reports . For the case of Zhao Zuohai’s case, from May 9 to June 8, there were 5 reports in Sichuan Daily (the “Daily Newspaper”) and 11 articles in Huaxi Dushi Bao (hereinafter referred to as “Huaxi”). In addition, “West China” took the lead in reporting on May 10 that “Zhao Zuohai was acquitted.” The first article in the “Daily News”