有位新闻学教授在报上写了篇《中国人与中国文》,用几个病句说明青年编辑、记者在语言基本功方面素质差。教授对青年的关心溢于言表,对维护汉语的规范,也是至诚的。然而,我认真拜读后,发现千把字中,可能由于疏忽,病句竟也有几处。这不禁使我怀疑他所举的那些病句全出自青年笔下,抑或也有“非青年”的疏忽。限于篇幅,仅举两例。一,“须知报刊、广播、电视的语言,本来应当是规范化的,足以为人表率。”“语言”怎么能“为人表率”呢?二, A journalism professor wrote an article entitled “Chinese and Chinese” in a newspaper, using several illiterate sentences to describe young editors and journalists with poor quality of basic language skills. The professors are overly concerned with the youth and are sincere about maintaining the Chinese language. However, after I seriously read the book, I found that there were several ill-written sentences in the Sentences. This can not help but make me suspect that the sentences he quoted are entirely from the young people’s writings or that they are also neglected by “non-youths.” Due to space limitations, just two cases. First, “Notice the language of newspapers, radio, television, should have been standardized, enough for the model.” “Language” how “man’s rate”? Second,