论文部分内容阅读
“有偿补课”禁令限制了在职中小学教师所享有的宪法规定的财产权、劳动权和平等权。尽管该禁令在宽松审查基准之下可以通过明确性和比例原则的合宪性审查,但在《义务教育法》、《教师法》等上位法律、行政法规未明确禁止有偿补课或未明确授权的前提下,教育部、省级人大常委会无权以行政规章或行政规定、地方性法规等形式禁止在职中小学教师有偿补课。
“Compensation subsidy ” ban limits the constitutional rights of the working primary and secondary school teachers, the right to property, labor and equal rights. Although the prohibition can pass the constitutionality review of the principle of sex and proportionality under the lenient examination standard, the laws and administrative regulations such as the Compulsory Education Law and the Teacher’s Law do not explicitly forbid compensating for overtime or not explicitly authorized Under the premise, the Ministry of Education and the Provincial People’s Congress have no power to prohibit serving primary and secondary school teachers from compensating for overtime in the form of administrative rules or administrative provisions and local laws and regulations.