论文部分内容阅读
在债权意思主义、物权形式主义和债权形式主义三种不同的物权变动模式下,对无权处分的认识存在差异。分析不同模式下无权处分的概念,求同存异,归纳出统一的构成要件并给予相应分类是消除争议、完善我国民法理论的现实需要,也是司法实践中应用无权处分理论来解决相关法律纠纷的客观要求。
There are differences in the understanding of the right to dispose under the three different real right modes of change: creditor’s rights doctrine, property formalism and debt formalism. Analysis of the concept of the right to dispose of different modes, seeking common grounds while reserving differences, inducting the unified constitutional elements and giving the corresponding classification are the actual need of eliminating the controversy and perfecting the civil law theory of our country, and also the objective of applying the theory of the right to dispose without authority in the judicial practice to resolve the related legal disputes Claim.