论文部分内容阅读
目前有些地球科学类国际期刊在文章致谢段中公布审稿人姓名,或者直接将审稿意见以报告形式刊出。分析表明:公布审稿人可为研究人员把握科研动向、跟踪研究进展提供帮助,具有科学研究风向标的作用;同时,公开审稿人可以使其规范自己的行为,审稿公开透明,起到监督作用,读者也可以通过审稿人甄别问题稿件,对文章进行选择引用。但是,多数审稿人对公开姓名持有保留态度,只有少数领域内的杰出的学者支持公开审稿人身份。本文作者认为:在获得审稿人同意的前提下,可以考虑公开杰出学者审稿人和绿色通道录用稿件的审稿人。由此可以获得读者认可,促进文章引用。
At present, some international journals of Earth Science publish the names of reviewers in the paragraph of acknowledgment of the articles, or directly publish the opinions of reviewers in the form of reports. The analysis shows that the publication of reviewers can help researchers grasp the trend of scientific research and track the progress of the research, and has the function of scientific research. At the same time, the public reviewers can make it regulate their own behavior, review the draft openly and transparently, Role, readers can also review the manuscript to identify issues, the article selection reference. However, most reviewers hold reservations about open names, and only prominent scholars in a few areas support public reviewers’ identities. The author of the paper thinks that under the premise of obtaining the consent of the reviewer, the reviewer of outstanding academic referees and green channel hiring manuscripts may be considered. This can be recognized readers, promote the article reference.