目次一、问题的提出:“机动车限行令”及其合宪性质疑二、私有财产权的宪法地位三、机动车限行构成宪法意义上的征用四、“机动车限行令”欠缺法律依据五、机动车限行符合但难以实现公共利益六、没有补偿的“机动车限行令”七、结语:违宪的“机动车限行令”一、问题的提出:“机动车限行令”及其合宪性质疑2008年6月,北京市政府根据北京市人民代表大会常务委员会《关于为顺利筹备和成功举办奥运会进一步加强法治环境建设的决议》,发布了《关于2008年北京奥运会、残奥会期间对本市机动车采取临时交通管理措施的通告》,决定从7月20日起至9月20日,北京市机动车将分单双号行驶。该通告的实施在某种程度上缓解了北京奥运期间的交通压力,改善了 First, the issue is raised: “motor vehicle limit order ” and its constitutional challenge Legal basis Fifth, the motor vehicle line with the line but difficult to achieve the public interest Sixth, there is no compensation “motor vehicle limit order ” VII Conclusion: unconstitutional “motor vehicle limit order ” First, the question put forward: “ ”In June 2008, according to the“ Resolution on Preparing and Successfully Hosting the Olympics to Further Strengthen the Construction of the Rule of Law and the Environment ”for the Beijing Municipal People’s Congress Standing Committee, the Beijing Municipal Government issued the“ Beijing Olympic Games, Paralympic Games during the city to take temporary traffic management measures notice, ”decided from July 20 until September 20, Beijing motor vehicles will be divided into single and double numbers. The implementation of the circular notice eased the traffic pressure during the Beijing Olympics to a certain extent and improved the