论文部分内容阅读
一直以来,高昂的诉讼成本,已成为制约环保公益组织提起环境公益诉讼诸多的现实障碍之一。推进环境公益诉讼,必须破解诉讼成本瓶颈,从政府层面构建有别于普通民事诉讼的、科学合理的、与环境公益诉讼的公益目的和属性相耦合的环境公益诉讼成本负担机制。梳理泰州市中级人民法院的一审判决书和江苏省高级人民法院的二审判决书,我们发现,泰州环境公益诉讼案一审案件受理费为973651.72元,二审案件受理费为947298.28元,环境损害鉴定评估费为10万元。三者相加达200多万元。这是一笔不小的费用。好在泰州环保联合会最终胜诉,这三笔费用皆判由被告和上诉企业支付。其实,泰州环保联合会作
All along, the high cost of litigation has become one of the practical obstacles that restrict the environmental public interest organizations to bring environmental public interest litigation. To promote environmental public interest litigation, it is necessary to break the bottleneck of litigation costs and establish a scientific and reasonable cost-sharing mechanism of environmental public interest litigation which is different from ordinary civil litigation and which is connected with the public welfare purpose and attribute of environmental public interest litigation. Combining the first instance judgment of Taizhou Intermediate People’s Court with the second instance judgment of Jiangsu Higher People’s Court, we found that the acceptance fee of first instance trial of Environmental Public Interest Litigation of Taizhou is 973651.72 Yuan, the acceptance fee of second trial is 947298.28 Yuan, and the assessment fee of environmental damage appraisal is 10 Million. The sum of the three reached more than 200 million. This is not a small fee. Fortunately, the final victory of the Environmental Protection Confederation in Taizhou, the three charges are subject to payment by the defendant and the appeal of the enterprise. In fact, Taizhou Environmental Federation for the work