论文部分内容阅读
斯特内斯库成功地使罗马尼亚诗歌摆脱了教条主义的禁锢,实现了突围,让诗歌朝向着自身的本质回归。他恢复了罗马尼亚诗歌传统,并延续了20世纪上半叶现代主义所进行的尝试。他的诗中很少有被米沃什称之为“阴郁”的品质,也很少像当代西方诗歌那样,受到各种社会和文化思潮的影响,更没有那种无休止的形式上和语言上的实验,并且拒绝日常细节。相反,他保持和发扬了传统抒情诗歌的明朗与简净,而更多的是从生活本身来提炼诗意,来表达人生的意蕴,在内与外、现代与传统以及民族性与世界性上达到了一种很好的平衡。
Strauss-Krauch succeeded in freeing Romanian poetry from dogmatism, achieving a breakthrough and returning poetry to its very essence. He restored the Romanian poetic tradition and continued the attempt by modernism in the first half of the twentieth century. Few of his poems have been described by Milos as “gloomy” qualities, as rarely as the contemporary Western poetry, under the influence of various social and cultural currents of thought, and more without the kind of endless form And language experiments, and reject daily details. On the contrary, he maintains and carries forward the clear and conciseness of traditional lyric poetry, and more from the poetic nature of life to express the meaning of life, which is achieved both inside and outside, modernity and tradition, as well as ethnicity and cosmopolitanity A good balance.