论文部分内容阅读
目的随访对比后牙区S L A和SLActive种植体周围软组织参数,评价SLActive种植体周围软组织临床学表现。方法 55例患者后牙区植入33颗SLA种植体和34颗SLActive种植体,对比测量术后6月、12月、18月和24月的种植体周围软组织参数。结果两组对比,m PLI、m SBI指数在术后6月、12月、18月、24月的变化差异均无显著性,PPD指数在术后6月、12月、18月、24月的变化差异均有显著性。结论 SLActive促进软硬骨组织结合,增加临床安全性。
Objective To compare the soft tissue parameters of SLA and SLActive implants in follow-up and evaluate the clinical manifestations of soft tissue around SLActive implants. Methods 33 patients with SLA implants and 34 SLActive implants were implanted into the posterior teeth of the 55 patients. The soft tissue parameters around the implants were measured at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months after operation. Results There was no significant difference in the change of m PLI and m SBI index between June, December, December, and 24 months after operation in both groups. The PPD index showed no significant difference between June, December, December and 24 months after operation The differences were significant. Conclusion SLActive promotes the combination of soft and hard tissue and increases the clinical safety.