论文部分内容阅读
学界一般认为,方回“一祖三宗”说的提出是陈与义与江西诗派关联挂钩的开始。其实,方回的观点渊源有自来。若接着方回对江西诗派的定义、逻辑反溯诗史,可发现胡穉《增广笺注简斋诗集》已是陈与义“江西诗派化”之肇始。胡注陈诗是陈与义诗歌流传史上最重要的注本,然其语典诠释颇多漏注、误注,且满纸引用杜甫诗歌作为陈诗语典出处,胡注本以其偏颇的注释遮蔽了陈与义原初多元的诗歌宗尚。后代对陈与义诗的接受正在胡注出现后发生转向,主流观点从认为其学韦柳一派转为认定其主要学杜甫。在某种程度上,胡注本推动了南宋陈与义的“江西诗派化”进程。
It is generally accepted by the academic community that the proposal put forward by Fang Hui and “three ancestors of three ancestry” is the beginning of the connection between Chen Yuyi and Jiangxi Poetry School. In fact, Fang Hui’s point of view comes from. If we next turn back to the definition and logic of Jiangxi Poetry School, we can find that the original poems of Zhuanzhai Zhuanzhai by Hu Yan are the beginning of Chen Yuyi and Jiangxi Poetry School. Hu Chen Chen poetry is the most important note in the history of Chen Yuyi’s poetry. However, there are many omissions and mistakes in its interpretation of the text, and Du Fu’s poetry is cited as the source of Chen’s poetry in full text. Hu Zhuben obscures Chen Yiyi The original plural poetry is still. The offspring’s acceptance of Chen Yuyi’s poems is turning around after the emergence of Hu’s poems. The mainstream view is changed from the thought of Wei Liu School to the identification of its main academic Du Fu. To a certain extent, Hu Benben promoted the process of Chen Yi-yi’s “Jiangxi Poeticization” in Southern Song Dynasty.