论文部分内容阅读
我国《民法通则》第130条虽然规定共同侵权行为人应承担连带责任,但由于《民法通则》未明确共同侵权行为的构成要件和类型,因而给审判实践正确处理共同侵权行为民事责任,造成了不便。特别是在因复数污染源引起的环境侵权事件纠纷中,由于因果关系判明极为复杂,加上法律规定得不明确,更使得对有关行为人的共同侵权民事责任的确定难上加难。这一问题,直到最高人民法院于2003年12月26日颁布《最高人民法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题
Although Article 130 of the “General Principles of Civil Law” stipulates that joint tort liability should be jointly and severally liable, civil liability for correctly handling common tort acts in trial practice is not clear because “General Principles of Civil Law” does not specify the components and types of joint tort actions, resulting in inconvenient. Especially in disputes over environmental infringement caused by multiple sources of pollution, the determination of causation is difficult because of the extremely complicated causation and the unclear legal provisions. This issue until the Supreme Court on December 26, 2003 promulgated the "Supreme People’s Court on the hearing of a number of issues relating to the application of personal injury compensation law