论借用合同中的费用分担问题

来源 :法制与社会 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:simon_01
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
借用合同在法律中没有规定,实践中却大量存在。过去,人们因生产、生活而借用的物品价值较低,主要局限于价值不大的生产生活用品,争议较少。随着社会的发展,人们物质生活水平的提高,借用物的范围也越来越广,价值也越来越大,特别是房屋的借用呈增涨势,借用人对房屋装修的诉讼也随之增加。本文指出为更好协调借用关系,减少纠纷,有必要对借用存续期间房屋装修费用分担的问题进行探讨。 Loan contract is not stipulated in the law, but there is a lot of practice. In the past, people borrowed goods for production and living because of their low value, which were mainly confined to the production of daily necessities of little value, with less controversy. With the development of society, people’s material and living standards improve, the range of borrowed objects is also wider and wider, and the value is also growing. In particular, the borrowing of houses is on the rise. Borrowers’ lawsuits against house decoration also follow increase. This paper points out that in order to better coordinate and borrow the relationship and reduce disputes, it is necessary to explore the issue of sharing the cost of housing renovation during the period of borrowing.
其他文献
加强任职教育实验教学,对深入推进任职教育改革,有效提高岗位任职实践能力培养的效果水平和,具有十分重要的意义。本文以任职教育与学历教育实验教学的区别出发,深入分析了任职教